Many are calling the Iranian unrest the Twitter Revolution, and I agree. The above image, from Pew Research of course, displays that during the week of June 15-21, precisely 98% of the most popular links on Twitter were on Iran.
I have my own concerns on the willingness of online media to turn to Twitter and YouTube. In Iran’s case, these two media proved to be an effective means for the people to tell their story, but how can a 140 character post or an amateur video be fact checked? Essentially, isn’t it foreseeable that some people could feel desperate enough to dramatise or even fake a post or a video to draw more attention. I am not accusing Iranian people but pointing out online’s media blind acceptance to post and repost. Then again, not to post runs the risk of missing the story.
This link shows the results of the study and other information too. Online media, for instance, covered the topic of Iran more than 30% than the printed press. Two reasons for this - unlimited space online versus precious and limited paper, and keeping online information fresh through updates versus avoiding overkill of a topic dominating a single publication.
Iran’s government tried to crackdown on all internet use and Twitter, a social media I am easily bored with although I don’t have a revolution to fight for either, proved to be an effective means of disseminating information from within the oppressive state to the outside world. But, it even helped Iranians communicate with each other as the state-run media was not going to cover the protests honestly.